Why Did Two Supervisors Reach Different Conclusions?
- Daniel Zehnder

- 12 minutes ago
- 2 min read

Governance, in body-worn camera programs, is the organizational structure that defines how authority is exercised, footage is reviewed, decisions are documented, and oversight is applied—ensuring consistency, accountability, and defensibility at scale.
Imagine two supervisors independently reviewing body-worn camera recordings of the following incident:
An officer conducts a nighttime traffic stop on a vehicle with expired registration.
During the stop, the officer:
Advises dispatch of the stop but does not immediately provide the vehicle license plate.
Positions the patrol vehicle at a slight angle behind the violator.
Approaches on the driver's side.
Does not use a flashlight while approaching.
Engages the driver professionally.
Observes indicators of impairment but ultimately releases the driver after field investigation.
Completes the stop without incident.
Supervisor A notes:
Officer maintained a professional demeanor.
Investigation was legally sufficient.
Documentation was complete.
No further action required.
Supervisor B notes:
Delayed radio update created an unnecessary officer safety concern.
Driver-side approach should have been evaluated.
Failure to use available illumination reduced situational awareness.
Field investigation was insufficient.
Recommend documented coaching.
Both supervisors have experience. Both understand department policy. Both believe they conducted a thorough review. Yet they reach different conclusions. One determines the officer acted appropriately. The other recommends corrective action. Leadership should respond with a simple question: "Which supervisor got it right?" That may not be the most important question. A better question is: "Why did two competent supervisors reviewing similar events reach different conclusions?"
Many agencies immediately attribute inconsistent review outcomes to supervisory performance. Sometimes that assumption proves correct. Often, however, the organization should first examine its governance.
Leadership should ask:
Did both supervisors receive the same review expectations?
Did the organization define what each supervisor should evaluate?
Did both supervisors apply the same documentation standards?
Did leadership establish consistent escalation criteria?
Did both supervisors understand the purpose of the review in the same way?
When leadership cannot answer those questions confidently, supervisors often rely on professional judgment to fill the gaps. Professional judgment is essential. But judgment alone cannot create organizational consistency. Governance creates consistency by defining expectations, establishing structure, and providing leadership with visibility into how supervisory decisions occur across the organization.
I'm not suggesting that supervisors should reach identical conclusions every time.
Different facts may justify different outcomes. The concern arises when similar situations produce different decisions because the agency never established clear governance expectations. Leadership should understand that difference. Before concluding that supervisors need additional training or accountability, leadership should determine whether the governance structure provides supervisors with the consistency necessary to make defensible decisions.
Strong governance does not eliminate professional judgment. It ensures the agency applies that judgment within a consistent, well-defined framework.
About Principis Group
Principis Group provides governance-focused advisory, assessment, and training services supporting defensible, sustainable body-worn camera programs nationwide.
Leadership teams often recognize symptoms—documentation gaps, inconsistent reviews, uneven practices, limited visibility—but symptoms do not always reveal underlying governance conditions. Understanding whether governance structures function consistently across the organization often provides a clearer starting point before making additional policy, technology, or process decisions.
Learn more about Principis Group's Body-Worn Camera Governance and Review Program:



Comments